Entries by

Why Correct Independent Contractor Status Matters: The Tax Trap That’s Costing Businesses Millions in Penalties

Misclassifying workers could cost your business thousands in penalties and back taxes—but getting it right can lead to significant cost savings and flexibility.

As businesses navigate the ever-changing landscape of workforce management, one classification decision stands out as particularly consequential: determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. This distinction carries significant implications for your tax obligations, legal compliance, and bottom line.

Understanding Independent Contractors

Group of independent contractors

Independent contractors are self-employed individuals who provide services to other businesses. Unlike employees, contractors maintain control over how they complete their work, often use their own equipment, and typically work for multiple clients simultaneously.

The classification is not merely a matter of preference or convenience; it is determined by specific legal tests that examine the relationship between the business and the worker. Getting this classification wrong can expose your company to substantial liability.

Legal Tests for Independent Contractor Status

Several different tests are used to determine whether a worker qualifies as an independent contractor. The Common Law Test is the traditional approach that focuses on the level of control a business has over a worker. The more control exercised, the more likely the worker is an employee rather than an independent contractor.

The Economic Reality Test examines whether workers are economically dependent on the business or are in business for themselves. Courts examine the permanency of the relationship, the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss, their investment in equipment, the degree of control exercised by the employer, the skill level required for the work, and whether the service is integral to the employer’s business. All these factors help determine if the worker is truly independent or functionally an employee.

Increasingly popular among states is the ABC Test, a more stringent evaluation that presumes workers are employees unless the business can prove all three specific conditions. First, the worker must be free from the company’s control and direction. Second, the worker must perform services outside the company’s usual course of business. Third, the worker must be customarily engaged in an independently established trade or occupation. Failing to satisfy any single requirement means the worker should be classified as an employee.

Current Department of Labor Guidance

The Department of Labor (DOL) has gone through several iterations of guidance on this issue. In 2021, the DOL proposed a rule that would return to a more traditional “totality of the circumstances” approach, focusing on multiple factors rather than giving primacy to any single element.

Under current guidance, the DOL considers several important factors in their assessment. They look at the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss, investments made by the worker, the degree of permanence in the relationship, the nature and degree of control exercised by the business, the integration of the work into the employer’s business, and the skill and initiative required to perform the work. No single factor is determinative; rather, the DOL examines how these factors collectively reveal the economic reality of the working relationship.

Businesswoman in front of a bookshelf

Benefits of Proper Independent Contractor Classification

When classification is appropriate, using independent contractors offers several advantages for businesses. Companies can realize cost savings by avoiding employment taxes, benefits packages, and overtime payments. There’s also greater flexibility to scale the workforce up or down as needed without the complexity of hiring and termination processes. Businesses gain access to specialized expertise without long-term commitment, and they benefit from reduced payroll and HR administrative burdens.

For contractors themselves, the arrangement offers significant advantages as well. They enjoy greater autonomy with freedom to control their work schedule and methods. They can diversify income sources by working with multiple clients. Many independent contractors also benefit from potential tax advantages through business expense deductions. Perhaps most importantly, contractors have the entrepreneurial opportunity to build their own business entities and establish their professional identities.

Best Practices for Independent Contractor Relationships

To maintain proper independent contractor relationships, businesses should implement several important practices. Always use written agreements that document the relationship with a detailed independent contractor agreement specifying the terms of engagement, project scope, payment schedules, and clarifying the independent nature of the relationship.

Split image of a man in a business suit and a man in construction clothes

It is essential to maintain an appropriate distance by avoiding controlling how contractors complete their work. Let them determine their own methods, schedules, and approaches to achieving the agreed-upon results. Keep documentation of the contractor’s business status, such as their business cards, website information, and evidence of other clients, which demonstrates their independence.

Businesses should treat contractors differently than employees, avoiding inviting them to employee-only events or including them in employee perks and benefits programs. This separation helps reinforce the distinct nature of the relationship. Regular review is also important—periodically to assess these relationships to ensure they still qualify as independent contractors under applicable tests and laws.

When to Seek Expert Guidance

Given the significant financial implications of worker misclassification, businesses should consider consulting with legal or HR experts in certain situations. When engaging long-term contractors, converting employees to contractors, receiving an audit notice related to worker classification, or expanding operations into new states with different classification standards, professional guidance becomes particularly valuable. These experts can help navigate the complex regulatory landscape and minimize risks of costly misclassification errors.

The distinction between employees and independent contractors remains a critical compliance issue for businesses of all sizes. By understanding the legal tests, documenting relationships appropriately, and seeking expert guidance when needed, your business can navigate this complex area while minimizing risk.

Remember that worker classification rules continue to evolve, with various federal agencies and state governments sometimes applying different standards. Staying informed about these changes is essential for maintaining compliant employment practices that protect both your business interests and your relationships with valuable contributors.

Businessmen with a paper that reads See HR in a new light


This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific guidance related to your business situation, please consult with qualified legal counsel.

CHRonicles – Quid Pro Quo

CHRONICLES, The Chronicles of HR, CHR since 2024

What Every Business Owner Needs to Know

In this edition of HR Chronicles, we examine a critical workplace issue that can devastate companies of all sizes—quid pro quo harassment. Through our experience guiding businesses through these challenging situations, we share insights to help you protect your employees and your business.

What Does "Quid Pro Quo" Mean in Workplace Harassment?

“Quid Pro Quo”—a Latin phrase meaning “this for that”—refers to a specific type of unlawful sexual harassment that creates a clear power imbalance in the workplace. This harassment manifests in two primary ways:

  1. The exchange offer: When a manager promises an employee benefits like a promotion, raise, or special opportunities in exchange for sexual favors or romantic attention.
  2. The negative consequence: When a supervisor threatens negative job actions—demotion, reduced hours, poor assignments, or even termination —if an employee refuses sexual advances.

Real-World Examples You Might Encounter

  • A department manager repeatedly invites a specific employee to “discuss their career over drinks,” hinting that saying yes could lead to opportunities others won’t receive.
  • A supervisor tells a new hire they have “great potential” and could be fast-tracked for advancement if they’re “willing to be friendly” outside work hours.
  • A business owner makes comments about an employee’s appearance followed by statements like “being nice to me could really help your position here.”

These scenarios aren’t just uncomfortable—they create legal liability that can threaten your business’s reputation, finances, and future.

The Real Impact: Beyond Legal Concerns

For victims, quid pro quo harassment causes:

  • Severe anxiety and emotional distress
  • Decreased job performance and engagement
  • Long-term career disruption
  • Mental health challenges
  • Loss of professional confidence

Sad woman with her personal items in a cardboard box

Men in business suits thinking with a folder that says Lawsuit

For organizations, the consequences include:

  • Significant legal liability and potential lawsuit costs
  • Damaged reputation in the marketplace and community
  • Decreased overall employee morale and productivity
  • Loss of talented employees
  • Costly settlements and lengthy legal proceedings

 Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, quid pro quo harassment constitutes sex discrimination, making organizations legally responsible for preventing and addressing these situations.

Preventative Strategies: How CHR Helps Businesses Stay Protected

At Consolidated Human Resources, we believe prevention is the best protection. Our comprehensive approach includes:

  1. Custom Policy Development: We create clear, specific anti-harassment policies tailored to your business needs and industry requirements.
  2. Management Training: Our specialized training helps leaders recognize potential issues before they escalate and respond appropriately when concerns arise.
  3. Confidential Reporting Systems: We implement secure channels for employees to report concerns without fear of retaliation.
  4. Investigation Support: When issues arise, our HR experts provide step-by-step guidance to ensure proper handling and documentation.
  5. Organizational Culture Assessment: We help identify and address underlying cultural factors that might enable inappropriate behavior.

A Success Story: Prevention in Action

Recently, a manufacturing client contacted us about implementing better HR practices. During our initial assessment, we discovered supervisors regularly made casual comments about employees’ appearance and occasionally suggested certain team members could receive better shifts if they were “friendlier.” Though no formal complaints had been filed, these were clear warning signs.

Smiling man putting his hand on a concerned and uncomfortable woman's shoulders

People smiling and writing on a desk with a card saying See HR in a new Light

Working with company leadership, we:

  • Implemented comprehensive harassment policies
  • Conducted targeted training for all management personnel
  • Established anonymous reporting mechanisms
  • Loss of talented employees
  • Created clear promotion and scheduling protocols to eliminate subjective decision-making

Six months later, employee satisfaction scores improved by 28%, turnover decreased, and the company avoided what could have become a significant legal liability.

Reach out to our team with any questions:

Karen R

Karen Roche | Executive Vice President of Human Resources | General Counsel

karen@chrusa.com

(EXT 230)

Kelcey C

Kelcey Castro | Human Resources Manager

kelcey@chrusa.com

(EXT 246)

Introducing Kelcey Castro, Human Resources Manager

It is our pleasure to extend a warm welcome to Kelcey Castro, who joins us as our Human Resources Manager. Kelcey brings with her a wealth of experience and an unwavering dedication to fostering inclusive and supportive workplace environments. With a robust background in HR, Kelcey excels in policy development, handbook creation, employee recruitment, and […]

HR Chronicles: Unveiling Insights & Lessons

What Would You Do? A Potential Drug and Alcohol Issue

HR Chronicles is a periodic look at real-life situations for which our HR experts have provided client guidance.

Workplace Compliance and Purpose

A Company’s objective is to maintain a drug and alcohol-free work environment that is safe and productive for Employees and others doing business with the Company. The use, possession, purchase, sale, distribution, or being under the influence of any narcotic substance and/or the misuse of legal drugs while on Company or client premises or while performing services for the Company is strictly prohibited and violates Workplace Safety standards.

achohol and pills

Companies also prohibit employees from reporting to work or performing services under the influence of alcohol or consuming alcohol while on duty or during work hours. Companies prohibit off-premises abuse of alcohol and controlled substances, as well as the possession, use, or sale of narcotic substances, when these activities adversely affect job performance, job safety, or the any Company reputation in the community.

What is Reasonable Suspicion?

The concept of the term Reasonable Suspicion is a belief or hunch, that an Employee is under the influence of drugs and alcohol and is adversely affecting job performance.

The Employee poses a threat to themselves, others, or the Company. This evidence might come from observations made by co-workers, and information shared during meetings or training sessions.

Potential Scenario

A 45-year-old nurse has worked for the Hospital for three years, but you have been a supervisor for only six weeks. This morning, as you are making your “rounds”, you noticed the Employee was not walking straight and was muttering. You checked the patients’ records and you noticed the Employee is behind schedule.

You approached the Employee and asked how it is going. The Employee’s complexion was flushed, eyes were red and tearing.

When you asked the Employee again if there are any problems, the Employee looked at you and seemed unfocused. The Employee was distant and mumbled an incoherent response.

Ask the Employee to accompany you to your office or other private area. Ask if the Employee is okay; solicit a coherent verbal response. Identify and confront the Employee with your observations. Explain that a Reasonable Suspicion test will be conducted.

  • flushed complexion
  • red, watery eyes
  • unresponsive to verbal greeting
  • unfocused, distracted eye contact
  • incoherent, mumbled speech

Reasonable Suspicion testing might be necessary. Both an alcohol and drug test maybe warranted since signs and symptoms are consistent with either drug or alcohol use.

If your company is experiencing similar issues, contact us for a confidential consultation. All employee-related matters will be help in the strictest confidence. 

CHR Spotlight: The Women Who Make Our HR Department Tick

Karen Roche, our executive vice president of human resources and general counsel, leads the all-female HR department at CHR. With a client-centric focus and attention that goes above and beyond daily HR activities, Karen and her team—Kelcey Castro, HR manager, and Ivonne Wareka, HR coordinator—ensure each client who engages with them always feels strongly supported. […]

HR Chronicles: Unveiling Insights & Lessons

Work-Place Safety & Hostile Work Environments

HR Chronicles is a periodic look at real-life situations for which our HR experts have provided client guidance.

The Situation

An Employer had two Employees who started arguing aggressively and yelling in front of the other Employees in the workplace.

One of the Employees felt uncomfortable and physically threatened. The Manager was called and informed of the situation.

There are steps the Manager could take in a situation like this – some are more appropriate than others. The Manager can:

  • Investigate and collect all information and details of the situation. This would include interviewing both individuals and collecting witness statements. Then review all information and determine the type of disciplinary action to implement.
  • Terminate both Employees without an investigation.
  • Continue with normal operations and ignore the situation.
  • Suspend both Employees, pending an investigation.

Depending on the severity of the altercation the Employer may choose to suspend both Employees (to be fair to both) pending investigation and investigate and collect all information/ details. The Manager should interview both individual’s and collect witness statements, then review all information and determine the type of disciplinary action to take.

In this case, the investigation determined:

  • On several occasions, Employee #2 has made offensive racists remarks and inappropriate jokes towards Employee #1. In addition, Employee #2 frequently block’s Employee #1 movements around the workplace. Employee #1 has asked Employee #2 to stop this behavior; this behavior occurs in front of numerous coworkers.

A hostile work environment is one where the words and actions of a supervisor, manager or coworker negatively or severely impacts another employee’s ability to complete their work. Any employee can be responsible for creating a hostile work environment. Hostile words and actions include:

  • Repeated offensive remarks
  • Inappropriate jokes
  • Racists remarks
  • Discrimination of any kind
  • Obstruction of someone’s movements, such as blocking them from any movement throughout the workplace.

  • The intended victims of the harasser.
  • Bystanders, co-workers and/or vendors who witness the offensive conduct.

Important to note: The intended victim should make it clear to the harasser that the behavior is unwelcome and should stop.

If your company is experiencing similar issues, contact us for a confidential consultation. All employee-related matters will be help in the strictest confidence. 

Introducing Karen Ehrenberg, Our New Director of HRIS & Operations

Please join us in welcoming Karen Ehrenberg as our Director of HRIS & Operations. In this role she will play a key behind-the-scenes role overseeing our HRIS and Payroll functions. Karen comes to CHR with considerable experience in the payroll and tax fields. She has developed and implemented payroll systems for small to large-scale enterprises. […]

Hire the Right Talent Faster with CHR’s Applicant Tracking System

Let’s streamline your talent acquisition process.
Busy HR professionals know that recruiting and hiring the best talent takes time and money. CHR’s Applicant Tracking System is designed to streamline the entire talent recruiting process with Automated job posting, Candidate communications, Custom screening questions, and Tag & keyword matching.
Get our helpful ATS Guide!

Department of Homeland Security Provides Certainty For I-9 Employment Verification

On July 21, 2023, the USCIS gave employers a new option for verifying employment eligibility. Effective August 1, 2023, employers have an alternative procedure by which qualifying employers may inspect employees’ Form I-9 documentation virtually as opposed to performing a physical verification. This physical examination was required for all new hires until the COVID-19 exception […]

Federal Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Due This Month

Federal employment law is about to give birth to some long-overdue requirements. As of June 27, 2023, employers with 15 or more employees must provide pregnancy-related accommodations to employees and applicants under the federal Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA). Below we will refer to employees and applicants collectively as “employees.” Pregnancy Related Accommodations Under the […]

Workplace Harassment: Who Is Affected?

Workplace harassment or discrimination is not limited to employees or direct victims of the act. Other people who can be affected by verbal, physical, or other harassment include anyone in the work environment who perceives the behavior as hostile. These may be co-workers who are sitting nearby and are bothered by it or a visitor […]

What is Workplace Bullying?

Sad to say, many people are victims or witnesses to workplace bullying. As defined by SHRM, workplace bullying is “repeated, health-harming mistreatment of one or more people by one or more perpetrators.” This persistent, pervasive, inappropriate behavior—direct or indirect—falls into several categories. What is workplace bullying behavior? Threats, intimidation, or humiliation Verbal abuse such as […]